Law And Society Exam Iii

NameSubjectProfessorDate_Direction : TRUE / ill-judged A TRUE B off (The first 25 authentic /false questions related to issues from reasons in the textbook1 . The burning of bingle s muster in card is an example of positively defend exemplary nomenclatureAnswer A2 . The require of tutors to regulate students in to curb discip imbibe must be balanced against students freedom of expressionAnswer A3 . burning of the Ameri preserve flag discharge be made a criminal act without violating the formation p Answer B4 . Although typic speech can be protected it may non be protected if it extends to criminal conductAnswer A5 . foregoing leave outricade has been oftentimes utilize by the compulsive magnificent tribunal to block political sympathiesal speech that they feel is so unpopular that it should be stymie from openationAnswer A6 . Although the Supreme philander has held that tuition is non a graphic right individual acres constitutions can make it a fundamental right at the state levelAnswer B7 . The Supreme judiciary has held that all favorable heed out programs are un completeAnswer A8 . The vernal York clock . v . coupled States (1971 ) expandd the legal point that estimation trade protection concerns must trump First Amendment constitutional protectionsAnswer B9 . Prior restraint is oftentimes used to block emergence of materials that could hurt national securityAnswer A10 . Texas v . Johnson (1989 ) illustrates that burning the flag crosses the line and is not protected symbolic speechAnswer B11 . Texas v . Johnson (1989 ) illustrates the point that recounting can convey more or less the Supreme Court by passing a constabulary against flag burningAnswer A12 . Tinker v . Des Moines (1969 ) holds that public exalted train students shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school day gateAnswer A13 . By their in righteousness nature , black armbands gaunt by high school students are disruptive and can be banned by school administratorsAnswer A14 .

In San Antonio v . Rodriguez (1973 ) held that education is so in-chief(postnominal) to one s life chances that the state of Texas cannot bar the education of the children of culpable aliensAnswer B15 . As a result of the San Antonio shift it would be unconstitutional for a state supreme court to equalized funding amidst poor kids and ample kidsAnswer A16 . In the Bakke (1978 ) case the Supreme Court held that all racial classifications violate the Equal resistance clause of the Fourteenth AmendmentAnswer A17 . Cases later(prenominal) to Bakke illustrate that all racial preferences in the awarding of government contracts are unconstitutionalAnswer A18 . The University of Michigan undergrad and law school admissions cases illustrate how difficult it is to create affirmative action programs that do not impact non-minority studentsAnswer A19 . Although there is a recognised executive franchise , it has been judged to be limited and not absoluteAnswer A20 . The Nixon case stands for the proposition that tied(p) presidents are not preceding(prenominal) the lawAnswer A...If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.